Arm’s length prices may vary across different markets even for transactions involving the same property or services; therefore, to achieve comparability requires that the markets in which the independent and associated enterprises operate do not have differences that have a material effect on price or that appropriate adjustments can be made. As a first step, it is essential to identify the relevant market or markets taking account of available substitute goods or services. Economic circumstances that may be relevant to determining market comparability include the geographic location; the size of the markets; the extent of competition in the markets and the relative competitive positions of the buyers and sellers; the availability (risk thereof) of substitute goods and services; the levels of supply and demand in the market as a whole and in particular regions, if relevant; consumer purchasing power; the nature and extent of government regulation of the market; costs of production, including the costs of land, labour, and capital; transport costs; the level of the market (e.g. retail or wholesale); the date and time of transactions; and so forth. The facts and circumstances of the particular case will determine whether differences in economic circumstances have a material effect on price and whether reasonably accurate adjustments can be made to eliminate the effects of such differences. More detailed guidance on the importance in a comparability analysis of the features of local markets, especially local market features that give rise to location savings, is provided in Section D.6 of this chapter.
TPG2017 Chapter I paragraph 1.110
Category: D. Guidance for applying the arm's length principle, OECD Transfer Pricing Guidelines (2017), TPG2017 Chapter I: The Arm's Length Principle | Tag: Comparability analysis, Economic circumstances, FAR analysis, Functional analysis, Local comparables, Local market features, Location savings
« Prev |
Next » Related Guidelines
- TPG2022 Chapter I paragraph 1.130Arm’s length prices may vary across different markets even for transactions involving the same property or services; therefore, to achieve comparability requires that the markets in which the independent and associated enterprises operate do not have differences that have a material effect on...
- TPG2022 Chapter I paragraph 1.133In cases where similar controlled transactions are carried out by an MNE group in several countries and where the economic circumstances in these countries are in effect reasonably homogeneous, it may be appropriate for this MNE group to rely on a multiple-country comparability...
- TPG2022 Chapter I paragraph 1.132The geographic market is another economic circumstance that should be identified. The identification of the relevant market is a factual question. For a number of industries, large regional markets encompassing more than one country may prove to be reasonably homogeneous, while for others,...
- TPG2022 Chapter I paragraph 1.131The existence of a cycle (e.g. economic, business, or product cycle) is one of the economic circumstances that should be identified. See paragraph 3.77 in relation to the use of multiple year data where there are cycles....
- TPG2022 Chapter I paragraph 1.77The identity of the party or parties assuming risks may be set out in written contracts between the parties to a transaction involving these risks. A written contract typically sets out an intended assumption of risk by the parties. Some risks may be...
- TPG2022 Chapter I paragraph 1.70Assume that an investor hires a fund manager to invest funds on its account. Depending on the agreement between the investor and the fund manager, the latter may be given the authority to make portfolio investments on behalf of the investor on a...
Related Case Law
- Panama vs “Petroleum Wholesale Corp”, September 2020, Administrative Tribunal, Case No TAT-RF-062“Petroleum Wholesale Corp” is engaged in the wholesale of petroleum products, accessories and rolling stock in general in Panama. Following a thorough audit carried out by the Tax Administration in Panama, where discrepancies and inconsistencies had been identified between the transfer pricing documentation...
- India vs Quark Systems Pvt. Ltd. Oct 2014, Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ITA No. 282/Del/2012Insilco is engagedengaged in the business of manufacturing and sale of silica. The TNMM had been applied as the most appropriate method for determining arm’s length income. Following an audit, the tax administration rejected the TNMM and instead applied a CUP method. An...
- European Commission vs Amazon and Luxembourg, May 2021, European General Court, Case No T-816/17 and T-318/18In 2017 the European Commission concluded that Luxembourg granted undue tax benefits to Amazon of around €250 million. Following an in-depth investigation the Commission concluded that a tax ruling issued by Luxembourg in 2003, and prolonged in 2011, lowered the tax paid by...
- Latvia vs SIA „RPM”, May 2013, Administrative District Court, A420496211 (A-00305-13/7)The tax authority (SRS) had disregarded the TP method chosen by the taxpayer and performed its own TP analysis which showed that the income had been below the 1. quartile, and on that basis an assessment of additional taxable income was issued. Judgment...
- Panama vs Puma Energy Bahamas SA, June 2024, Supreme Court, N° 849112020Puma Energy Bahamas SA is engaged in the wholesale of petroleum products, accessories and rolling stock in general in Panama. Following a thorough audit carried out by the Tax Administration in Panama, where discrepancies and inconsistencies had been identified between the transfer pricing...
