TPG2022 Chapter X paragraph 10.162

Category: D. Financial guarantees, TPG2022 Chapter X: Transfer pricing aspects of financial transactions | Tag: , , , , , , ,
« | »

This section elaborates on the effect of group membership on determining the arm’s length price of financial guarantees, building upon the principles laid out in Section C.1.1.






Related Guidelines

  1. TPG2022 Chapter X paragraph 10.63Credit ratings can be determined for the overall creditworthiness of an MNE or MNE group4 or for a specific issuance of debt. As detailed in the following paragraphs, determining credit ratings requires consideration of quantitative – e.g. financial information – and qualitative factors...
  2. TPG2022 Chapter X paragraph 10.3The conditions of financial transactions between independent enterprises will be the result of various commercial considerations. In contrast, an MNE group has the discretion to decide upon those conditions within the MNE group. Thus, in an intra-group situation, other considerations such as tax...
  3. TPG2022 Chapter X paragraph 10.155In general, a financial guarantee provides for the guarantor to meet specified financial obligations in the event of a failure to do so by the guaranteed party. There are various terms in use for different types of credit support from one member of...
  4. TPG2022 Chapter X paragraph 10.77In the context of intra-group loans, this incidental benefit that the MNE is assumed to receive solely by virtue of group affiliation, is referred to as implicit support. The effect of potential group support on the credit rating of an entity and any...
  5. TPG2022 Chapter X paragraph 10.156The accurate delineation of financial guarantees requires initial consideration of the economic benefit arising to the borrower beyond the one that derives from passive association, as explained in the Section C.1.1.3....
  6. TPG2022 Chapter X paragraph 10.166The examination of financial guarantees under accurate delineation needs also to consider the financial capacity of the guarantor to fulfill its obligations in case of default of the borrower. This requires an evaluation of the credit rating of the guarantor and the borrower,...
  7. TPG2022 Chapter X paragraph 10.163By providing an explicit guarantee the guarantor is exposed to additional risk as it is legally committed to pay if the borrower defaults. Anything less than a legally binding commitment, such as a “letter of comfort” or other lesser form of credit support,...
  8. TPG2022 Chapter X paragraph 10.159Where the effect of an intra-group guarantee as accurately delineated is to reduce the cost of debt-funding for the borrower, it might be prepared to pay for that guarantee, provided it was in no worse a position overall. In considering the borrower’s overall...
  1. United Arab Emirates issues comprehensive Transfer Pricing Guide23 October 2023, the United Arab Emirates issued a comprehensive practical Transfer Pricing Guide. The guide is designed to provide general guidance on the Transfer Pricing regime in the UAE with a view to making the provisions of the Transfer Pricing regulations as...
  2. OECD releases text of the new MLC to Implement Amount A of Pillar One11 October 2023 the OECD/G20 Inclusive Framework has released the text of a new multilateral convention that updates the international tax framework to co-ordinate a reallocation of taxing rights to market jurisdictions, improve tax certainty, and remove digital service taxes.  The Multilateral Convention to...

Related Case Law

  1. UK vs. DSG Retail (Dixon case), Tax Tribunal, Case No. UKFT 31This case concerns the sale of extended warranties to third-party customers of Dixons, a large retail chain in the UK selling white goods and home electrical products. The DSG group captive (re)insurer in the Isle of Man (DISL) insured these extended warranties for...
  2. Germany vs “G-Lender GmbH”, February 2019, Bundesfinanzhof, Case No IR 81/17G-Lender GmbH, owned 50% of Austrian company A GmbH. The remaining 50% of the shares in A GmbH were held by non related shareholders, who at the same time acted as managing directors of A GmbH. G-Lender GmbH granted A GmbH a total...
  3. Poland vs Cash Pool B sp z.o.o., November 2019, Supreme Administrative Court, Case No II FSK 3798/17At issue in this case was whether a deposit in a cash pool constituted a loan. According to the company, cash transfers made as part of cash pooling cannot be considered a loan agreement because they do not contain elements that are material...
  4. Spain vs “XZ SA”, March 2022, TEAC, Case No Rec. 4377-2018“XZ SA” is a Spanish parent of a tax consolidation group which is part of a multinational group. The Spanish group participates in the group’s cash pooling system, both as a borrower and as a provider of funds. The objective of cash pooling...