When an associated enterprise is acting only as an agent or intermediary in the provision of services, it is important in applying a cost based method that the return or mark-up is appropriate for the performance of an agency function rather than for the performance of the services themselves. In such a case, it may not be appropriate to determine arm’s length pricing as a mark-up on the cost of the services but rather on the costs of the agency function itself. For example, an associated enterprise may incur the costs of renting advertising space on behalf of group members, costs that the group members would have incurred directly had they been independent. In such a case, it may well be appropriate to pass on these costs to the group recipients without a mark-up, and to apply a mark-up only to the costs incurred by the intermediary in performing its agency function.
TPG2017 Chapter VII paragraph 7.34
Category: B. Main issues, OECD Transfer Pricing Guidelines (2017), TPG2017 Chapter VII: Special Considerations for Intra-Group Services | Tag: Cost base, Cost plus method, Intra-group services, Pass-through costs, Service fee, Services
« Prev |
Next » Related Guidelines
- TPG2022 Chapter VII paragraph 7.34When an associated enterprise is acting only as an agent or intermediary in the provision of services, it is important in applying a cost based method that the return or mark-up is appropriate for the performance of an agency function rather than for...
- TPG2022 Chapter VII paragraph 7.36For example, it may be the case that the market value of intra-group services is not greater than the costs incurred by the service provider. This could occur where, for example, the service is not an ordinary or recurrent activity of the service...
- TPG2022 Chapter VII paragraph 7.35Depending on the method being used to establish an arm’s length charge for intra-group services, the issue may arise whether it is necessary that the charge be such that it results in a profit for the service provider. In an arm’s length transaction,...
- TPG2022 Chapter VII paragraph 7.56The initial step in applying the simplified approach to low value-adding intra-group services is for the MNE group to calculate, on an annual basis, a pool of all costs incurred by all members of the group in performing each category of low value-adding...
- TPG2022 Chapter VII paragraph 7.33Where a cost based method is determined to be the most appropriate method to the circumstances of the case, the analysis would require examining whether the costs incurred by the group service provider need some adjustment to make the comparison of the controlled...
- TPG2022 Chapter VII paragraph 7.31The method to be used to determine arm’s length transfer pricing for intra-group services should be determined according to the guidelines in Chapters I, II, and III. Often, the application of these guidelines will lead to use of the CUP or a cost-based...
Related Case Law
- Italy vs KAI S.r.l. (Shell Italia Aviazione), March 2026, Supreme Court, Case No 5753/2026KAI S.r.l. (formerly Shell Italia Aviazione s.r.l.) is an Italian company operating in the oil sector, specifically in the marketing of aviation fuel (jet fuel) for the Shell Italia group. It was wholly owned by Shell Italia Holding S.p.A. The dispute concerned the...
- Portugal vs “Software Services S.A.”, September 2024, CAAD, Case No 71/2024-TThe transactions audited related to the remuneration of “Software Services S.A.”, which had been determined using the TNMM with ROTC as the PLI. The ROTC margin had been set at 4.1% in 2019, which was within the arm’s length range of 3.4% to...
- Tanzania vs Amadeus Global Travel Distribution Limited, March 2026, Court of Appeal, Civil Appeal No. 227 of 2025Amadeus Global Travel Distribution Limited is a Tanzanian branch of a Kenya-resident entity, itself a wholly owned subsidiary of Amadeus ITG based in Madrid, Spain. The appellant's business consists of commercialising the Amadeus GDS system in Tanzania. The dispute concerned the income year...
- Tanzania vs PE of Aggreko International Projects Ltd, December 2025, Court of Appeal, Civil Appeal No 182 of 2025, 2025 TZCA 1258A Tanzanian branch of UK-incorporated Aggreko International Projects Limited claimed deductions for head office and Dubai regional hub costs allocated on a pro rata revenue basis for 2018 and 2019. The Tanzania Revenue Authority disallowed the expenses citing insufficient documentation and failure to...
- Poland vs P. sp. z o.o., May 2025, Supreme Administrative Court, Case No II FSK 1097/22A Polish subsidiary corrected its 2015 tax return, reducing its declared revenue by applying a revised 6.5% cost-plus margin aligned with group-wide policy. Tax authorities rejected the correction, conducted their own comparability analysis, and issued a revised assessment disallowing certain pass-through costs. The...
