TPG2020 Chapter X paragraph 10.105

Category: C. Treasury function, C.1. Intra-group loans, OECD Transfer Pricing Guidelines (2017), TPG2020 Chapter X: Financial Transactions | Tag: , , , , ,
« | »

In their most common variation, economic models calculate an interest rate through a combination of a risk-free interest rate and a number of premiums associated with different aspects of the loan – e.g. default risk, liquidity risk, expected inflation or maturity. In some instances, economic models would also include elements to compensate the lender’s operational expenses.






Related Guidelines

  1. TPG2022 Chapter X paragraph 10.106The reliability of economic models’ outcomes depends upon the parameters factored into the specific model and the underlying assumptions adopted. In evaluating the reliability of economic models as an approach to pricing intra-group loans it is important to note that economic models’ outcomes...
  2. TPG2022 Chapter X paragraph 10.91The arm’s length interest rate for a tested loan can be benchmarked against publicly available data for other borrowers with the same credit rating for loans with sufficiently similar terms and conditions and other comparability factors. With the extent of competition often present...
  3. TPG2022 Chapter X paragraph 10.105In their most common variation, economic models calculate an interest rate through a combination of a risk-free interest rate and a number of premiums associated with different aspects of the loan – e.g. default risk, liquidity risk, expected inflation or maturity. In some...
  4. TPG2022 Chapter X paragraph 10.98One consideration to be kept in mind with the cost of funds approach is that it should be applied by considering the lender’s cost of funds relative to other lenders operating in the market. The cost of funds can vary between different prospective...
  5. TPG2022 Chapter X paragraph 10.92In the search for comparability data, a comparable is not necessarily restricted to a stand-alone entity. In examining commercial loans, where the potentially comparable borrower is a member of an MNE group and has borrowed from an independent lender, provided all other economically...
  6. TPG2022 Chapter X paragraph 10.58Borrowers seek to optimise their weighted average cost of capital and to have the right funding available to meet both short-term needs and long-term objectives. When considering the options realistically available to it, an independent business seeking funding operating in its own commercial...
  7. TPG2022 Chapter X paragraph 10.103Accordingly, the use of credit default swaps to approximate the risk premium associated to intra- group loans will require careful consideration of the above-mentioned circumstances to arrive at an arm’s length interest rate....
  8. TPG2022 Chapter X paragraph 10.108Such an approach would represent a departure from an arm’s length approach based on comparability since it is not based on comparison of actual transactions. Furthermore, it is also important to bear in mind the fact that such letters do not constitute an...
  1. German royalty barrier to counter IP box-regimesSome countries in Europe offer so-called IP or Patent boxes. To counter such tax practices, effective from 31 December 2017, Germany has introduced a new royalty barrier in ‘Law against Harmful Tax Practices in Connection with the Assignment of Rights. The law limits...
  2. United Arab Emirates issues comprehensive Transfer Pricing Guide23 October 2023, the United Arab Emirates issued a comprehensive practical Transfer Pricing Guide. The guide is designed to provide general guidance on the Transfer Pricing regime in the UAE with a view to making the provisions of the Transfer Pricing regulations as...

Related Case Law

  1. Spain vs. PEUGEOT CITROEN AUTOMOVILES, May 2016, Supreme Court, case nr. 58/2015The company had deducted impairment losses recognised on an investment in an Argentinean company (recently acquired from a related entity) arising from the conversion into capital of loans granted to the entity by other group companies, loans which had been acquired by the Spanish taxpayer. The...
  2. Sweden vs. Diligentia, June 2010, Regeringsratten case nr 2483-2485-09Diligentia was the parent company of a Group active in real estate. After a take-over of Diligentia by another Group, Skandia Liv, external loans in Diligentia were terminated and replaced with intra-group loans from the new parent company, Skandia Liv. The new loans had an interest rate...
  3. Netherlands vs X B.V., November 2018, Supreme Court, Case No 17/03918A Dutch company, Lender BV, provided loans to an affiliated Russian company on which interest was paid. The Dispute was (1) whether the full amount of interest should be included in the taxable income in the Netherlands, or if part of the “interest payment” was...
  4. France vs Willink SAS, December 2022, Conseil d’Etat, Case No 446669In 2011, Willink SAS issued two intercompany convertible bonds with a maturity of 10 years and an annual interest rate of 8%. The tax authorities found that the 8% interest rate had not been determined in accordance with the arm’s length principle. Willink...