Both the arm’s length price-setting and the arm’s length outcome-testing approaches, as well as combinations of these two approaches, are found among OECD member countries. The issue of double taxation may arise where a controlled transaction takes place between two associated enterprises where different approaches have been applied and lead to different outcomes, for instance because of a discrepancy between market expectations taken into account in the arm’s length price-setting approach and actual outcomes observed in the arm’s length outcome-testing approach. See paragraphs 4.38 and 4.39. Competent authorities are encouraged to use their best efforts to resolve any double taxation issues that may arise from different country approaches to year-end adjustments and that may be submitted to them under a mutual agreement procedure (Article 25 of the OECD Model Tax Convention).
TPG2017 Chapter III paragraph 3.71
Category: B. Timing issue in comparability, OECD Transfer Pricing Guidelines (2017), TPG2017 Chapter III: Comparability Analysis | Tag: Comparability analysis, Hindsight, Timing issues, Year end adjustment« Prev | Next »
TPG2017 Chapter III paragraph 3.69